# Paul Chang v. Natalie Novell Washington

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · October 11, 2012

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3121042

## Case

- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** October 11, 2012
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3121042

## Opinion text

Opinion issued October 11, 2012

In The

Court of Appeals
For The

First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-12-00792-CV
———————————
PAUL CHANG, Appellant
V.
NATALIE NOVELL WASHINGTON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 328th District Court
Fort Bend County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 09DCV168859

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(1). The motion contains a certificate of conference, but the certificate of

conference merely indicates that appellee has been informed that appellant is
moving to dismiss this appeal, and does not indicate whether appellee is opposed

or unopposed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a). Ten days have passed, however, and

appellee has not filed a response in opposition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(b)

(providing that court may determine motion before response is filed), 10.3(a)

(providing, in pertinent part, that court should not hear or determine motion until

10 days after motion was filed, unless motion states that parties have conferred and

that no party opposes motion). No opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(1).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Brown.

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3121042. Public record. Not legal advice.