# in Re James Harris

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · January 31, 2013

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3119657

## Case

- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** January 31, 2013
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3119657

## Opinion text

Opinion issued January 31, 2013.

In The

Court of Appeals
For The

First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-12-01153-CR
———————————
IN RE JAMES HARRIS, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

James Harris has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, contending that the

trial court erred by denying his motion for “diligent participation credit” pursuant

to article 42.12, section 15(h) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 1 See TEX. CODE

CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 42.12, § 15(h) (West Supp. 2012). We deny relator’s

petition, and we dismiss all outstanding motions as moot.

1
The underlying case is State v. Harris, No. 135795301010 in the 176th District
Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Shawna L. Reagin presiding.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3119657. Public record. Not legal advice.