# Erpad International Corporation, Carlos Davila Alma Delia De La Vega & Rafael G. De La Vega v. Jose Miguel Dominguez & Ricardo Henriquez

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · February 21, 2013

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3119436

## Case

- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** February 21, 2013
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3119436

## Opinion text

Opinion issued February 21, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals
For The

First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-12-00333-CV
———————————
ERPAD INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, CARLOS DAVILA, ALMA
DELIA DE LA VEGA & RAFAEL G. DE LA VEGA, Appellants
V.
JOSE MIGUEL DOMINGUEZ & RICARDO HENRIQUEZ, Appellees

On Appeal from the 151st District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2010-68248

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, Erpad International Corporation, Carlos Davila, Alma Delia de

la Vega, and Rafael G. de la Vega, previously notified this Court that the parties

had entered into a settlement agreement in this case. The appellees, Jose Miguel
Dominguez and Ricardo Henriquez, have now filed a cover letter and an “Agreed

Order of Dismissal” signed by counsel for all parties. The proposed order states:

“The parties having announced to the Court that they have settled, at the parties’

request this appeal is hereby dismissed. Costs are taxed to the party incurring

same.” The Court construes this “Agreed Order of Dismissal”, signed by counsel

for all parties, as a motion to dismiss the appeal. No opinion has issued.

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown.

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3119436. Public record. Not legal advice.
