# George E. Dixon v. Carmen Nance Sanders N/K/A Carmen Lee Nance Gambrill

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · February 26, 2013

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3119351

## Case

- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** February 26, 2013
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3119351

## Opinion text

Opinion issued February 26, 2013

In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas

NO. 01-12-00655-CV

GEORGE E. DIXON, Appellant

V.

CARMEN NANCE SANDERS N/K/A CARMEN LEE NANCE GAMBRILL,
Appellee

On Appeal from the 405th District Court
Galveston County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 07CV0656

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellee, Carmen Nance Sanders n/k/a Carmen Lee Nance Gambrill, moves

to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution because appellant, George E. Dixon,

has failed to timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a) (authorizing dismissal
for failure of appellant to file brief). The appellate record was complete September

20, 2012. Appellant’s brief was due on October 22, 2012. See TEX. R. APP. P.

38.6(a) (governing time to file brief). Over ten days have passed and appellant has

not responded to appellee’s motion to dismiss. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3,

38.8(a)(1).

Accordingly, we grant appellee’s motion and dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). We dismiss all other

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown.

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3119351. Public record. Not legal advice.