# Ronald Lucero v. State

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · March 21, 2013

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3118966

## Case

- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** March 21, 2013
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3118966

## Opinion text

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-12-01010-CR
Style: Ronald Lucero
v The State of Texas
Date motion filed*: March 14, 2013
Type of motion: Motion to stay the issuance of the mandate
Party filing motion: Appellant
Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:
Original due date:
Number of previous extensions: Current Due date:
Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted
If document is to be filed, document due:
 Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to
extend time
 Denied
 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)
 Other: _____________________________________
According to Lucero’s motion, he has not yet filed a petition for discretionary review;
any order on the motion would therefore be premature. Further, because this is not an
accelerated appeal, our mandate will not issue until after the Court of Criminal Appeals
resolves any timely-filed petition for discretionary review. See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.1, 18.6.

Judge's signature:/s/ Harvey Brown


Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: March 21, 2013
November 7, 2008 Revision

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3118966. Public record. Not legal advice.