# in Re Pedro Lucio

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · July 2, 2013

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3116729

## Case

- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** July 2, 2013
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3116729

## Opinion text

Opinion issued July 2, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals
For The

First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-13-00503-CR
———————————
IN RE PEDRO LUCIO, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Pedro Lucio, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus.1 Relator

does not specify the order from which he seeks relief, but instead claims that he is

1
Relator identifies the underlying case as cause number CR-03-028, from the 22nd
District Court of Hays County, Texas, and the Respondent as the State of Texas.
His conviction was affirmed by the Third Court of Appeals in Lucio v. State, No.
03-03-00448-CR, 2005 WL 607698, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Mar. 17, 2005, pet.
ref’d) (mem. op.) (not designated for publication).
“unlawfully restrained and confined” on his conviction for attempted sexual

assault.2

This Court lacks jurisdiction over this case arising out of a county not within

our jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.201(b) (Vernon Supp. 2012).

Conclusion

We dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Brown, and Huddle.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

2
See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.011 (Vernon 2011).
2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3116729. Public record. Not legal advice.