# Artis Charles Harrell v. Branch Brinson, Salon Park Dairy Ashford, L.L.C. A/K/A S.P. Dairy Ashford, L.L.C., and Brinson Management Corporation

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · July 11, 2013

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3116644

## Case

- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** July 11, 2013
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3116644

## Opinion text

Opinion issued July 11, 2013

In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas

NO. 01-13-00313-CV

ARTIS CHARLES HARRELL, Appellant

V.

BRANCH BRINSON, SALON PARK DAIRY ASHFORD, L.L.C. a/k/a S.P.
DAIRY ASHFORD, L.L.C., AND BRINSON MANAGEMENT
CORPORATION, Appellees

On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2006-02867

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Artis Charles Harrell, has neither paid the required fees nor

established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1;
see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013);

Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts

of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket

No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1).

After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not

adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 42.3(c).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees.

We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Brown, and Huddle.

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3116644. Public record. Not legal advice.