# Opinion

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · December 23, 2013

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3111027

## Case

- **Full name:** Carolyn Calkins James, Individually and as Next Friend of Her Elderly Mother, Mary Olive Calkins v. Honorable Olen Underwood, Honorable Patrick Sebesta and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Richard Stephen Calkins as Agent in Fact for Mary Olive Calkins and Michael Easton, Individually and as Assignee of Richard Stephen Calkins
- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** December 23, 2013
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3111027

## Opinion text

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION
Cause Number: 01-13-00277-CV
Trial Court Cause
Number: 2012-51725
Carolyn Calkins James, Individually and as next friend of her elderly mother, Mary Olive
Style: Calkins
v Honorable Olen Underwood, Honorable Patrick Sebesta and Fidelity and Deposit
Company of Maryland, Richard Stephen Calkins as agent in fact for Mary Olive Calkins
and Michael Easton, Individually and as assignee of Richard Stephen Calkins
Date motion filed*: December 19, 2013
Type of motion: Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief
Party filing motion: Carolyn James, individually and as next friend of her elderly mother, Mary Olive Calkins
Document to be filed: Appellant's Reply Brief

Is appeal accelerated? Yes No

If motion to extend time:
Original due date: December 20, 2013
Number of previous extensions granted: one
Date Requested: January 16, 2014

Ordered that motion is:

Granted
If document is to be filed, document due: January 3, 2014
Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time
The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time.
Denied
Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)
Other:

Judge's signature: /s/ Harvey Brown
Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of

Date: December 23, 2013
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3111027. Public record. Not legal advice.
