# in Re Edward R. Newsome

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · February 11, 2014

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3109447

## Case

- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** February 11, 2014
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3109447

## Opinion text

Opinion issued February 11, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals
For The

First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-14-00012-CV
———————————
IN RE EDWARD R. NEWSOME, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Edward R. Newsome, seeks relief from this Court by petition for

writ of mandamus.* Relator does not name a respondent, identify a specific action

of the trial court from which he seeks relief, state any facts pertinent to the issues

or points presented, or present any argument concerning why he is entitled to

1
The underlying case is Newsome v. Walgreen Drug Store, No.1995-25994 in the 189th
District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Bill Burke presiding.
mandamus relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3 (stating required contents of petition for

writ of mandamus).

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Brown.

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3109447. Public record. Not legal advice.