# Chauffeurs, Teamsters And Helpers Local Union No. 171 v. National Labor Relations Board

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · March 8, 1973 · 473 F.2d 1386

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/308654

## Case

- **Full name:** Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers Local Union No. 171, Affiliated With International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board, and Overnite Transportation Company, Inc., Intervenor
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 8, 1973
- **Citations:** 473 F.2d 1386; 82 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2895; 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11235
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/308654

## Opinion text

473 F.2d 1386
82 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2895 , 70 Lab.Cas. P 13,487
CHAUFFEURS, TEAMSTERS AND HELPERS LOCAL UNION NO. 171,
affiliated with International Brotherhood of
Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and
Helpers of America, Petitioner,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, and Overnite
Transportation Company, Inc., Intervenor.
No. 72-2015.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Argued Feb. 7, 1973.
Decided March 8, 1973.
Hugh J. Beins, Washington, D. C. (Robert M. Baptiste, Washington, D. C., on brief), for petitioner.
David Miller, Atty., N. L. R. B. (Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and William F. Wachter, Washington, D. C., Atty., on brief), for respondent.
J. W. Alexander, Jr., Charlotte, N. C. (Blakeney, Alexander & Machen, Charlotte, N. C., on brief), for intervenor.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, BUTZNER, Circuit Judge, and BRYAN, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
1
A review of the record discloses that substantial evidence supports the orders of the Board. Accordingly, enforcement is granted for the reasons stated by the Board. See 192 N.L.R.B. No. 25, 77 L.R.R.M. 1875 and 197 N.L.R.B. No. 153, 80 L.R.R.M. 1841 .

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/308654. Public record. Not legal advice.