# Milan M. Vuitch, M. D. v. James Brown Hardy, Acting Warden of the Maryland Penitentiary

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · February 20, 1973 · 473 F.2d 1370

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/308641

## Case

- **Full name:** Milan M. VUITCH, M. D., Appellee, v. James Brown HARDY, Acting Warden of the Maryland Penitentiary, Appellant
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** February 20, 1973
- **Citations:** 473 F.2d 1370; 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11540
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Bryan, Winter, Butzner
- **Cited by:** 10 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/308641

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM:
The district court held that petitioner had exhausted his available state remedies prior to filing an application for a writ of habeas corpus and that the writ should issue because the Maryland Therapeutic Abortion Act, 4B Ann.Code of Maryland, Art. 43, §§ 137 et seq. (1971 Repl. Vol.), under which petitioner was convicted, was unconstitutional, be
*1371
cause of the limitations which it placed upon the performance of an abortion. We agree that petitioner had exhausted his available state remedies. Subsequent to the argument before us, the Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade, - U.S. -, 93 S.Ct. 705 , 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973) and Doe v. Bolton,-U.S. — , 93 S.Ct. 739 , 35 L.Ed.2d 201 (1973). These cases make clear that the district court correctly decided the case, and we affirm on their authority.
Affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/308641. Public record. Not legal advice.