# Joshua Jumbo v. Rittenhouse SRO Ltd

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · March 31, 2015

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3079741

## Case

- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** March 31, 2015
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3079741

## Opinion text

Opinion issued March 31, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals
For The

First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-14-00959-CV
———————————
JOSHUA JUMBO, Appellant
V.
RITTENHOUSE SRO LTD., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 1054776

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Joshua Jumbo, has neither paid the required fees nor established

indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also

TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013), 101.0411
(West Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil

Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and before the Judicial Panel on Multi-district

Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). After being notified

that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd.

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3079741. Public record. Not legal advice.