# Robert Lee Lyles v. State

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · April 14, 2015

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3079367

## Case

- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** April 14, 2015
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3079367

## Opinion text

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: Robert Lee Lyles v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-14-00859-CV

Trial court case number: 2009-63597

Trial court: 151st Judicial District Court of Harris County

The panel has voted to deny appellant’s motion for rehearing.1

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley
 Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justices Keyes, Higley, and Brown

Date: April 14, 2015

1
Because appellant is pro se, we note that none of the cases in appellant’s motion address
his situation here where his untimely notice of appeal deprived this Court of jurisdiction
to consider the merits of his appeal, and we clarify that our memo opinion noted he must
file a bill of review in the trial court, not here. After the trial court’s plenary power
expired, appellant’s only legal recourse is to file “[a] bill of review [which] is a new suit
filed in the same court rendering the original judgment.” Urso v. Lyon Fin. Servs., Inc.,
93 S.W.3d 276, 280 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2002, no pet.) (citation omitted).
Generally, a bill-of-review plaintiff must file his claim within four years of rendition of
the judgment he attacks. See PNS Stores, Inc. v. Rivera, 379 S.W.3d 267, 275 (Tex.
2012). Thus, appellant still has an available remedy by filing a bill of review in the trial
court until four years after the October 4, 2013 final judgment, where he can try to prove
lack of timely service of that judgment and, if unsatisfied, can then appeal any adverse
bill-of-review decision to this Court.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3079367. Public record. Not legal advice.