# Cindy Garcia v. Google, Inc.

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · November 12, 2014

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3066219

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** November 12, 2014
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Nature of suit:** Civil
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3066219

## Opinion text

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CINDY LEE GARCIA, No. 12-57302
Plaintiff-Appellant,
D.C. No.
v. 2:12-cv-08315-
MWF-VBK
GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware
Corporation; YOUTUBE, LLC, a
California limited liability company, ORDER
Defendants-Appellees,

and

NAKOULA BASSELEY NAKOULA, an
individual, AKA Sam Bacile; MARK
BASSELEY YOUSSEF; ABANOB
BASSELEY NAKOULA; MATTHEW
NEKOLA; AHMED HAMDY; AMAL
NADA; DANIEL K. CARESMAN;
KRITBAG DIFRAT; SOBHI BUSHRA;
ROBERT BACILY; NICOLA BACILY;
THOMAS J. TANAS; ERWIN
SALAMEH; YOUSSEFF M. BASSELEY;
MALID AHLAWI,
Defendants.

Filed November 12, 2014
2 GARCIA V. GOOGLE, INC.

ORDER

THOMAS, Circuit Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges,
it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to
Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule
35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as
precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Wardlaw, Owens and Friedland did not participate
in the deliberations or vote in this case.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3066219. Public record. Not legal advice.