# Brown v. Comm PA Emergency

> Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · September 9, 2002

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3012039

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- **Decided:** September 9, 2002
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3012039

## Opinion text

Opinions of the United
2002 Decisions States Court of Appeals
for the Third Circuit

9-9-2002

Brown v. Comm PA Emergency
Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 01-3234

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2002

Recommended Citation
"Brown v. Comm PA Emergency" (2002). 2002 Decisions. Paper 557.
http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2002/557

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2002 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.
THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________

No. 01-3234
___________

CHARMAINE BROWN; ORAL DOUGLAS, in their individual capacities
and as Administrators of the Estate of Shacquiel A. Douglas

Appellants
v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES TRAINING INSTITUTE;
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; MARK STEWART, individual and official
capacity; JOHN CAFFEY, individual and official capacity
___________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
(D.C. No. 99-cv-04901)
District Judge: The Honorable Herbert J. Hutton
___________

SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING WITH SUGGESTION FOR
REHEARING EN BANC
__________

BEFORE: BECKER, Chief Judge,
SLOVITER, SCIRICA, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, MCKEE, RENDELL,
BARRY, AMBRO, FUENTES and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges

___________

The Petition for Rehearing filed by the Appellant in the above-entitled matter has
been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court and to all
other
available circuit judges in regular active service. The Court orders as follows: the Clerk
of Court shall vacate the opinion and judgment filed on August 8, 2002 in this matter and
list the above case for panel rehearing at the convenience of the Court.
It is so ordered.

By the Court,

/s/ Richard L
U.S. Circuit Judge

DATED: September 9, 200

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3012039. Public record. Not legal advice.