# William N. Grosch v. Curtis W. Tarr, the National Director of Selective Service

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · January 18, 1972 · 453 F.2d 1337

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/300987

## Case

- **Full name:** William N. GROSCH, Appellant, v. Curtis W. TARR, the National Director of Selective Service, Et Al., Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** January 18, 1972
- **Citations:** 453 F.2d 1337; 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11775
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Bryan, Per Curiam, Russell, Young
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/300987

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM:
The appellant sought declaratory and injunctive relief to require a reopening of his classification after notice of induction by his Selective Service Board. Relief was denied by the District Court on the basis of Section 10(b) of the Selective Service Act of 1967, which prohibits judicial review of the classification of a registrant after the issuance of an order of induction. We affirm. The Courts have, it is true, established certain minor exceptions to the prohibition on judicial review as prescribed by Section 10(b)
1
but the registrant did not bring himself within such exceptions.
Affirmed.
1
. See, Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11 (1968) 393 U.S. 233 , 89 S.Ct. 414 , 21 L.Ed.2d 402 ; Breen v. Selective Service Local Board (1970) 396 U.S. 460 , 90 S.Ct. 661 , 24 L.Ed.2d 653 , and Grosfeld v. Morris (4th Cir. 1971) 448 F.2d 1004 .

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/300987. Public record. Not legal advice.