# Opinion

> Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · October 9, 2015

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3009201

## Case

- **Full name:** Stephen R. Doroghazi, Cynthia Doroghazi, and Stephen P. Carrigan v. Texas Austin Hotel Realty, Inc. Interstate Management Company Interstate Hotels and Resorts Miriam Moorman, Hyatt Corporation Chris Dixon Preservation Assessment Services, LLC Dba Agua Terra Assessments Fine Family Corporation
- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
- **Decided:** October 9, 2015
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3009201

## Opinion text

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00599-CV

Stephen R. Doroghazi, Cynthia Doroghazi, and Stephen P. Carrigan, Appellants

v.

Texas Austin Hotel Realty, Inc.; Interstate Management Company; Interstate Hotels and
Resorts; Miriam Moorman, Hyatt Corporation; Chris Dixon; Preservation Assessment
Services, LLC dba Agua Terra Assessments; Fine Family Corporation; Select Hotels
Group, LLC; Fred Branovan; Camden Property Management; Camden Properties; Brown
Trout Investments, Ltd.; Austin Suites, Ltd.; Aushi Ltd.; Z-K Real Estate; and SL
Tuatara, Ltd., Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 353RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. D-1-GN-14-001682, HONORABLE AMY CLARK MEACHUM, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Clerk of this Court filed appellants’ notice of appeal of “order of sanctions” on

September 22, 2015. On September 29, 2015, the Clerk of this Court requested a response from

appellants regarding the basis on which this Court may exercise jurisdiction over this interlocutory

appeal. In response, appellants filed a notice of postponement of appeal, “notifying this Court of

Appellants intent to pursue this appeal when ripe to do so.”

Because we do not have jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal, we dismiss it for

want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a); Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 51.014 (generally

listing permitted interlocutory appeals).
__________________________________________
Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: October 9, 2015

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3009201. Public record. Not legal advice.