# The May Department Stores Company v. National Labor Relations Board

> Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · April 16, 1971 · 440 F.2d 993

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/295879

## Case

- **Full name:** The May Department Stores Company, D/B/A O'Neil Company v. National Labor Relations Board, Retail Clerks International Association, Local 698, Afl-Cio, Intervenor
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 16, 1971
- **Citations:** 440 F.2d 993; 77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2255; 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10687
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/295879

## Opinion text

440 F.2d 993
77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2255 , 65 Lab.Cas. P 11,699
The MAY DEPARTMENT STORES COMPANY, d/b/a O'Neil Company, Petitioner,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Retail Clerks
International Association, Local 698, AFL-CIO, Intervenor.
No. 20745.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
April 16, 1971.
Kenneth R. Millisor, Akron, Ohio, E. G. Kemp, Wise, Roetzel, Maxon, Kelly & Andress, Akron, Ohio, for petitioner.
Patricia Whorthy, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief, for respondent.
Before MILLER and KENT, Circuit Judges, and McALLISTER, Senior Circuit judge.
1
PER CURIAM ORDER.
2
This case is before the Court on a petition for review and a cross-petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board. The Board's decisions and order are reported at 184 N.L.R.B. No. 68.
3
This Court holds that there is substantial evidence on the record as a whole to support the Board's findings that the company interfered with, restrained and coerced its employees in the exercise of their rights under Section 7 of the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. 157, in violation of 8(a)(1).
4
It is ordered that the order of the Board be and is hereby enforced.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/295879. Public record. Not legal advice.