# Opinion

> Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · April 18, 2014

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2958528

## Case

- **Full name:** City of Austin v. Raymond E. Chandler, Daniel J. Amador, David Becker, John Beese, Nathan Blane Brown, Michael Carter, Anastacio Cruz, Eddie De La Garza, Jose L. Delgado, Carlos S. Dominguez, Kenneth J. Ferro, David Gannon, Abel Garza, Vincent Giles, Jr.
- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
- **Decided:** April 18, 2014
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2958528

## Opinion text

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

CORRECTED JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL18, 2014

NO. 03-12-00057-CV

City of Austin, Appellant

v.

Raymond E. Chander, Daniel J. Amador, David Becker, John Beese,
Nathan Blane Brown, Michael Carter, Anastacio Cruz, Eddie De La Garza, Jose L. Delgado,
Leland Scott DePue, Carlos S. Dominguez, Kenneth J. Ferro, David Gannon, Abel Garza,
Vincent Giles, Jr., Gregory T. Graboskie, M. Michael Hart, Bonnie Harvey, Cecil Jones,
Anthony Kubesch, Christopher Megliorino, Randy Mulroy, Lori Peterson, Steven K. Reid,
Roberto Rodriguez, Jorge Rojas, Richard Sanders, Harry Singletary, Steven J. Slavik,
Ralynn Taylor, Lasandra B. Williams, Ricardo Zapata, and John Zavala, Appellees

APPEAL FROM 353RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY
BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD
AFFIRMED ON REHEARING – OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on December 16, 2011. The Court’s

opinion and judgment dated February 7, 2014 are withdrawn. Having reviewed the record and the

parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment.

Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to

this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2958528. Public record. Not legal advice.