# Sliger, Billy Aaron > Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 6, 2009 URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2942019 ## Case - **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas - **Decided:** May 6, 2009 - **Precedential status:** Published - **Opinion:** Opinion - **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library ## Citator (automated) - No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases. - Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2942019 ## Opinion text IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR- 71,904-01 EX PARTE BILLY AARON SLIGER, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. CR17102 IN THE 35 TH DISTRICT COURT FROM BROWN COUNTY Per curiam. O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young , 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). After a period of deferred adjudication community supervision, Applicant was adjudicated guilty, convicted of aggravated sexual assault, and sentenced to fifty years' imprisonment. Applicant contends, inter alia , that counsel at his original plea rendered ineffective assistance by failing to investigate his mental history, allowing and encouraging him to make a plea deal for deferred adjudication community supervision when he should have known Applicant would not have been able to successfully complete the supervision due to his mental illness, and failing to discuss a possible defense due to his mental illness, which was known to counsel. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke , 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall provide Applicant's trial counsel with the opportunity to respond to Applicant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id . If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether original counsel knew of Applicant's mental health problems prior to the plea. The trial court shall make findings of fact as to what investigation, if any, counsel did into any possible defenses based on Applicant's mental illness history. The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether the performance of Applicant's trial attorney was deficient and, if so, whether counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. Filed: May 6, 2009 Do not publish --- Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2942019. Public record. Not legal advice.