# Brown, Jerome Diego

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · August 30, 2006

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2937662

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** August 30, 2006
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2937662

## Opinion text

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-33,202-11
EX PARTE JEROME DIEGO BROWN, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 0514634 IN THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT
FROM TARRANT COUNTY
Per curiam.
O R D E R
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young , 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated
assault of a peace officer and sentenced to thirty-two years' imprisonment.
In his present application, applicant raises one ground challenging his conviction. This
application, however, presents a more serious question. This Court's records reflect that applicant
has filed eight prior applications challenging this conviction. It is obvious from the record that
applicant continues to raise issues that have been presented and rejected in previous applications or
that should have been presented in previous applications. The writ of habeas corpus is not to be
lightly or easily abused. Sanders v. U.S. , 373 U.S. 1 (1963); Ex parte Carr , 511 S.W.2d 523 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1977). Because of his repetitive claims, we hold that applicant's claims are barred from
review under Article 11.07, § 4, and are waived and abandoned by his abuse of the writ.
Therefore, we instruct the Honorable Louise Pearson, Clerk of the Court of Criminal
Appeals, not to accept or file the instant application for a writ of habeas corpus, or any future
application attacking this conviction unless applicant is able to show in such an application that any
claims presented have not been raised previously and that they could not have been presented in a
previous application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Bilton , 602 S.W.2d 534 (Tex. Crim. App.
1980).
FILED: AUGUST 30, 2006
DO NOT PUBLISH

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2937662. Public record. Not legal advice.