# National Labor Relations Board v. Queen City Coach Company

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · March 9, 1970 · 420 F.2d 1383

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/288165

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** March 9, 1970
- **Citations:** 420 F.2d 1383; 73 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2672; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10388
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/288165

## Opinion text

420 F.2d 1383
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
QUEEN CITY COACH COMPANY, Respondent.
No. 13705.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Argued March 4, 1970.
Decided March 9, 1970.
On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.
Jesse I. Etelson, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner.
Ernest W. Machen, Jr., Charlotte, N. C. (Blakeney, Alexander & Machen, Charlotte, N. C., on the brief), for respondent.
Before SOBELOFF, BRYAN and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
Upon consideration of the Board's application for enforcement of its order and after hearing oral argument, the court is of the view that the order is well supported by the record as a whole.
2
The order is hereby enforced.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/288165. Public record. Not legal advice.