# Yvonne Marie Boyd v. United States of America, Intervenors-Appellee v. The Pointe Coupee Parish School Board

> Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · January 6, 1970 · 420 F.2d 379

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/287928

## Case

- **Full name:** Yvonne Marie BOYD Et Al., Plaintiff-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES of America, Intervenors-Appellee, v. the POINTE COUPEE PARISH SCHOOL BOARD Et Al., Defendants-Appellants
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- **Decided:** January 6, 1970
- **Citations:** 420 F.2d 379; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 11346
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Thornberry, Carswell, Clark
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/287928

## Opinion text

*380
PER CURIAM:
On July 25, 1969 the District Court entered an order instituting a desegregation plan for this school system. The defendant school board has filed a motion for supplemental relief and stay pending a hearing, or in the alternative, a stay pending appeal. These motions were denied by the District Court. The United States has moved for summary affirmance of the District Court’s order.
Under recent decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and of this Court
1
the order of the District Court be and it is hereby
Affirmed.
1
. Under tlie stringent requirements of Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education, 1969, 396 U.S. 19 , 90 S.Ct. 29 , 24 L.Ed.2d 19 , which this Court has carried out in United States v. Hinds County School Board, 5 Cir., 1969, 417 F.2d 852 , this Court has judicially determined that the ordinary procedures for appellate review in school segregation cases have to be suitably adapted to assure that each system, whose case is before us, “begin immediately to operate as unitary school systems”. Upon consideration of the record, the Court has proceeded to dispose of this case as an extraordinary matter. Buie 2, F.B.A.P.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/287928. Public record. Not legal advice.
