# Opinion

> Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · March 26, 2009

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2876971

## Case

- **Full name:** Emory B. Perry, James R. Palmersheim, Thomas Palmersheim, John Kee, David J. Herbert, Paul Bowman, John Chambers, Bradley P. Nordgren, Craig S. Nordgren, Rex Madion, William J. Drasky, Samantha Paulson, Kenneth Paulson, and Fred Ananian v. Darryl R. Cohen Andrew M. Brown Jenkens & Gilchrist Parker Chapin, L.L.P. And Jenkens & Gilchrist, P.C.
- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
- **Decided:** March 26, 2009
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2876971

## Opinion text

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
ON REMAND
NO. 03-05-00786-CV
Emory B. Perry, James R. Palmersheim, Thomas Palmersheim, John Kee,
David J. Herbert, Paul Bowman, John Chambers, Bradley P. Nordgren,
Craig S. Nordgren, Rex Madion, William J. Drasky, Samantha Paulson,
Kenneth Paulson, and Fred Ananian, Appellants
v.
Darryl R. Cohen, Andrew M. Brown; Jenkins & Gilchrist Parker Chapin, L.L.P.;
and Jenkins & Gilchrist, P.C., Appellees
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. GN403943, HONORABLE PAUL DAVIS, JUDGE PRESIDING
C O N C U R R I N G O P I N I O N
I agree that the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting the defendants'
special exceptions to the shareholders' second amended petition and ordering the shareholders to
replead specifically to identify any alleged harm, damage, or injury distinct from that incurred by
RAMP. I also agree that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the shareholders'
claims with prejudice for failure to comply with the district court's order. While the shareholders
did add allegations in their third amended petition that some of the plaintiffs purchased (and did not
merely hold) stock in reliance on misrepresentations by Cohen and Brown, they ultimately failed to
allege that these shareholders incurred any harm, injury, or damages from these purchases that were
distinct from those incurred by RAMP.
__________________________________________
Bob Pemberton, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Patterson and Pemberton
Filed: March 26, 2009

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2876971. Public record. Not legal advice.
