# Trailmobile Division, Pullman Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board

> Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · October 10, 1969 · 415 F.2d 1007

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/286434

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 10, 1969
- **Citations:** 415 F.2d 1007; 72 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2576; 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10469
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/286434

## Opinion text

415 F.2d 1007
TRAILMOBILE DIVISION, PULLMAN INCORPORATED, Petitioner,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.
No. 25470.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
October 10, 1969.
Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (Texas case).
Charles M. Lanier, New Orleans, La., Hulse Hays, Jr., Cincinnati, Ohio, Alan E. Harazin, Cincinnati, Ohio, Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, Cincinnati, Ohio, Phelps, Dunbar, Marks, Claverie & Sims, New Orleans, La., for petitioner.
Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., John D. Burgoyne, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, for respondent.
Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN and CARSWELL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
Upon consideration of this cause en banc the Court concludes that the opinion and judgment of the majority of the panel be and the same is hereby affirmed, 5 Cir., 407 F.2d 1006 .
2
JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, BELL, AINSWORTH, SIMPSON and MORGAN, Circuit Judges, dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/286434. Public record. Not legal advice.