# Michael Brown v. State

> Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · May 31, 2001

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2864031

## Case

- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
- **Decided:** May 31, 2001
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2864031

## Opinion text

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-00-00791-CR

Michael Brown, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 390TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 004085, HONORABLE FRED A. MOORE, JUDGE PRESIDING

A jury found appellant guilty of felony driving while intoxicated. See Tex. Penal Code

Ann. § 49.04(a), .09(b) (West Supp. 2001). The jury assessed punishment, enhanced by a previous

conviction for aggravated assault, at imprisonment for sixteen years.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by advancing contentions which counsel says might arguably support the appeal, together

with a professional evaluation demonstrating why these grounds are without merit. See also Penson

v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State,

516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972);

Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered
to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro

se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Mack Kidd, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Puryear

Affirmed

Filed: May 31, 2001

Do Not Publish

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2864031. Public record. Not legal advice.