# United States v. Charles Robert Young

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · February 7, 1969 · 406 F.2d 528

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/283290

## Case

- **Full name:** UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Charles Robert YOUNG, Appellant
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** February 7, 1969
- **Citations:** 406 F.2d 528
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Boreman, Bryan, Per Curiam, Winter
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/283290

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM:
Charles Robert Young appeals his conviction by the court on a charge of failing to submit to induction into the Armed Forces of the United States in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462. After having been classified as I-A and after being ordered to submit to induction he applied for a classification of I-O, Conscientious Objector, which application was denied.
A decision of the Selective Service Board as to a registrant’s classification made in conformity with regulations may be overturned by the courts only if it clearly appears that there is no basis in fact for such classification. Upon careful examination of the record we cannot say that there is no basis in fact for the Board’s determination. Therefore, the judgment of conviction will be affirmed.
1
Affirmed.
1
. Estep v. United States, 327 U.S. 114 , 66 S.Ct. 423 , 90 L.Ed. 567 (1946); United States v. Jones, 382 F.2d 255 (4 Cir. 1967); United States v. Jackson, 369 F. 2d 936, 938 (4 Cir. 1966); Blalock v. United States, 247 F.2d 615, 619 (4 Cir. 1957).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/283290. Public record. Not legal advice.