# Prince Lithograph Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · December 26, 1968 · 405 F.2d 175

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/282882

## Case

- **Full name:** PRINCE LITHOGRAPH CO., Inc., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** December 26, 1968
- **Citations:** 405 F.2d 175; 70 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2048; 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4358
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Bryan, Craven, Butzner
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/282882

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM:
On reciprocal petitions, Prince Lithograph Co., Inc. prays dissolution, and the National Labor Relations Board enforcement, of its order declaring Prince a violator of Section 8(a) (3) and (1) of the Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq., 158(a) (3) and (1). The finding, 171 NLRB No. 150 (June 6, 1968), was that the company in September 1967 at its plant in Fairfax County, Virginia, had discontinued part-time employment and withdrawn a tender of full-time employment of a lithographer because of his union participation.
Review of the record does not disclose an absence of substantial evidence permitting the Board’s determinations and curative directions. They may not, then, be disturbed. NLRB v. Lester Bros., Inc., 337 F.2d 706, 708 (4 Cir. 1964).
Order enforced.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/282882. Public record. Not legal advice.