# William Anderson, II v. J. Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · June 23, 2015 · 607 F. App'x 316

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2810900

## Case

- **Full name:** William Lee ANDERSON, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.L. BROWN, Unit Manager of B1 Pod; C/O Oliver, Defendants-Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 23, 2015
- **Citations:** 607 F. App'x 316
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Shedd, Duncan, Agee
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2810900

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6554

WILLIAM LEE ANDERSON, II,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

J. L. BROWN, Unit Manager of B1 Pod; C/O OLIVER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District
Judge. (7:14-cv-00184-MFU-JCH)

Submitted: June 18, 2015 Decided: June 23, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Lee Anderson, II, Appellant Pro Se. Kate Elizabeth Dwyre,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

William Lee Anderson, II, appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v. Brown,

No. 7:14-cv-00184-MFU-JCH (W.D. VA. Mar. 5 & Apr. 13, 2015). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2810900. Public record. Not legal advice.