# Timothy Valenzia v. Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 8, 2015

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2799622

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** May 8, 2015
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2799622

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2128

TIMOTHY VALENZIA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BALTIMORE CITY BOARD OF SCHOOL COMMISSIONERS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District
Judge. (1:12-cv-00243-CCB)

Submitted: April 30, 2015 Decided: May 8, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John H. Morris, Jr., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Darryl
G. McCallum, SHAWE & ROSENTHAL, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Timothy Valenzia appeals from the district court’s order

granting summary judgment in favor of the Baltimore City Board

of School Commissioners in his employment discrimination action.

We have reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on

appeal, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Valenzia v.

Baltimore City Bd. of Sch. Comm’rs, No. 1:12-cv-00243-CCB (D.

Md. Sept. 17, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2799622. Public record. Not legal advice.