# BI-LO, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · December 4, 1967 · 386 F.2d 834

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/278101

## Case

- **Full name:** Bi-Lo, Inc. v. National Labor Relations a Retail Food Store Chain in and Around Greenville, South Carolina, States It Is
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** December 4, 1967
- **Citations:** 386 F.2d 834; 67 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2075; 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4305
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Bryan, Winter, Jones
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/278101

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM:
The petition of Bi-Lo, Inc., operator of a retail food store chain in and around Greenville, South Carolina, states it is aggrieved by a final order of the National Labor Relations Board, 163 NLRB No. 138 , April 12, 1967, and asks that it be set aside. Section 10(f) Labor-Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160 (f). The Board’s answer prays the order’s enforcement. We think the Board should prevail.
As a whole, the evidence cannot be appraised as failing to furnish substantial undergirding for the Board’s findings and conclusions. It found undue inquisition and surveillance of the employees’ union interest, and the firing of three employees for union sponsorship. Denials of these charges — originated by the Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, Local 442, AFL-CIO — were made, but the Board resolved all the traverses against the employer. Within the Board’s prerogative, the decision cannot now be disturbed.
Order enforced.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/278101. Public record. Not legal advice.