# Orlando Brown v. South Carolina, State of

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · January 20, 2015

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2771384

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** January 20, 2015
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2771384

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2155

ORLANDO IRA BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior
District Judge. (3:13-cv-02983-MBS)

Submitted: January 15, 2015 Decided: January 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Orlando Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Orlando Brown appeals the district court’s order

adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and

dismissing without prejudice his discrimination complaint

against the State of South Carolina as barred by res judicata.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Brown v. South Carolina, No. 3:13-cv-02983-MBS (D.S.C.

Sept. 24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2771384. Public record. Not legal advice.