# Opinion

> Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · December 11, 2014

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2760048

## Case

- **Full name:** Sharif Choudhury, Tahera Chowdhury and Enterprise Houston, Inc., Rajinder Singh and Rita Kaur, Rajiv Chhabra and Gauri Chhabra v. Slawomir J. Skibicki and a & Skipol, Inc., a Texas Corporation
- **Court:** Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
- **Decided:** December 11, 2014
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2760048

## Opinion text

Order issued December 11, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals
For The

First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-14-00825-CV
———————————
SHARIF CHOUDHURY, TAHERA CHOWDHURY, AND ENTERPRISE
HOUSTON, INC., RAJINDER SINGH, RITA KAUR, RAJIV CHHABRA,
AND GAURI CHHABRA, Appellants
V.
SLAWOMIR J. SKIBICKI AND A & SKIPOL, INC., Appellees

On Appeal from the 11th Judicial District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2013-76488

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellants, Sharif Choudhury, Tahera Chowdhury, and Enterprise Houston,

Inc., have filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal and request that all

costs be assessed against the party incurring the same. Appellants state that
appellees have been contacted and do not oppose this motion and that this

dismissal will not prevent any other parties from seeking relief to which they

would otherwise be entitled. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(2), 42.1(a)(1). Although

other parties have filed their own notices of appeal, no opinion has issued

involving the above appellants. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal by Sharif

Choudhury, Tahera Chowdhury, and Enterprise Houston, Inc., with costs to be

taxed against the party who incurred the same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (b),

(d), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions by the above appellants as moot.

The appeal by the remaining appellants remains on this Court’s active docket.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Brown.

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2760048. Public record. Not legal advice.