# Jerome Brown v. Motorola Mobility Inc.

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · October 8, 2014

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2740742

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 8, 2014
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2740742

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1487

JEROME JULIUS BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MOTOROLA MOBILITY INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:13-cv-01514-GBL-IDD)

Submitted: October 1, 2014 Decided: October 8, 2014

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Julius Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Jerome Julius Brown appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Brown v. Motorola Mobility Inc., No. 1:13-

cv-01514-GBL-IDD (E.D. Va. Feb. 11, 2014). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2740742. Public record. Not legal advice.