# Malik Bey v. Shapiro Brown & Alt, LLP

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · October 6, 2014

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2739994

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** October 6, 2014
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2739994

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1378

MALIK BEY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

SHAPIRO BROWN & ALT, LLP, Substitute Trustees; NEW YORK
COMMUNITY BANK,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge.
(8:13-cv-01562-PWG)

Submitted: September 16, 2014 Decided: October 6, 2014

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Malik Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Bizhan Beiramee, Alexander Richard
Green, MCGINNIS WUTSCHER BEIRAMEE, LLP, Bethesda, Maryland;
Craig James Franco, ODIN, FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN, PC, Reston,
Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Malik Bey appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing his complaint alleging violations of the Fair Debt

Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692y (2012), the

Maryland Consumer Debt Collections Act, Md. Code Ann., Com. Law,

§§ 14-201 to -204, and the Maryland Consumer Protection Act, Md.

Code Ann., Com. Law, §§ 13-101 to -501, and denying

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Bey v. Shapiro Brown & Alt, LLP, No.

8:13-cv-01562-PWG (D. Md. Feb. 20 & Mar. 21, 2014). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2739994. Public record. Not legal advice.