# United States v. Dennis Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · August 29, 2014 · 580 F. App'x 270

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2722427

## Case

- **Full name:** UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis BROWN, Defendant-Appellant
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- **Decided:** August 29, 2014
- **Citations:** 580 F. App'x 270
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Clement, Prado, Elrod
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2722427

## Opinion text

Case: 13-10802 Document: 00512750662 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2014

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-10802
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit

FILED
August 29, 2014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DENNIS BROWN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:12-CR-295-1

Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Dennis Brown has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Brown has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 13-10802 Document: 00512750662 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/29/2014

No. 13-10802

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2722427. Public record. Not legal advice.