# National Labor Relations Board v. Pine Products Corporation

> Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 12, 1966 · 361 F.2d 480

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/271994

## Case

- **Full name:** NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. PINE PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Respondent
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- **Decided:** May 12, 1966
- **Citations:** 361 F.2d 480; 62 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2388; 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6194
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Merrill, Koelsch, Beeks
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/271994

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM:
The National Labor Relations Board has found that respondent violated section 8(a) (3) and (1) of the National 61 Stat. 140 , as amended, 73 Stat. 525 (1959), 29 U.S.C. § 158 (a) (3), (1) (1964), by discharging Floyd Manley Mergel because of union activities. It seeks enforcement of its order. Respondent here attacks the credibility determinations of the Trial Examiner and his choice of inferences. It persuasively argues that the discharge of Mergel was for legitimate business purposes and pursuant to legitimate managerial decisions.
On review the sole question is whether the Board’s findings are sup
*481
ported by substantial evidence on the whole record. We conclude that they are and that the order is entitled to enforcement.
It is so ordered.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/271994. Public record. Not legal advice.