# Randolph S. Koch v. US Merit Systems Protection Board

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · July 3, 2014

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2682209

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** July 3, 2014
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2682209

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2344

RANDOLPH S. KOCH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD; SUSAN TSUI
GRUNDMANN, In her Official Capacity as Chairman, U.S. Merit
Systems Protection Board,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (8:12-cv-01590-DKC)

Submitted: June 24, 2014 Decided: July 3, 2014

Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randolph S. Koch, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Gordon, Assistant
United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Randolph S. Koch appeals the district court’s order

dismissing this employment discrimination action pursuant to

Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Koch v. U.S. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

No. 8:12-cv-01590-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 2, 2013). We grant leave to

proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2682209. Public record. Not legal advice.