# Moore v. Justice Dept.

> District Court, District of Columbia · April 16, 2014

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2672227

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, District of Columbia
- **Decided:** April 16, 2014
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Judge Rosemary M. Collyer
- **Nature of suit:** Civil
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2672227

## Opinion text

FTLE?D

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Clsrk, |.IAi:?J|sltrl§t 821 gillis
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA guam forma msmct of '(':o';:m§¥a
Surf Moore, )
Plaintiff, §
v. § Civil Action No. /y-* y
Justice Dept. et al., §
Defendants. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiffs pro se Complaint and
application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the in forma pauperis application
and dismiss the case because the complaint fails to meet the minimal pleading requirements of
Rule S(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch,

656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. l987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires
complaints to contain "(l) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction
[and] (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief."
Fed. R. Civ. P. S(a); see Ashcrof‘ v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Cz'ralsky v. CIA, 355
F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). The Rule 8 standard ensures that defendants receive fair
notice of the claim being asserted so that they can prepare a responsive answer and an adequate

defense and determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califarzo, 75

F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

The plaintiff, a resident of Jackson, Mississippi, purports to sue the United States
Department of Justice and a construction company. Compl. at 2. The Complaint consists wholly
of incoherent statements and contains no discernible request for relief. Hence, this case will be

dismissed. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

i\

47
Date: April 2014

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2672227. Public record. Not legal advice.