# Julius v. Smithsonian Institution

> District Court, District of Columbia · November 27, 2009

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2666848

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, District of Columbia
- **Decided:** November 27, 2009
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Judge Ricardo M. Urbina
- **Nature of suit:** Civil
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2666848

## Opinion text

FILED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
NOV 2 7 2009
NANCY MAYER WHITTINGTON CLERK
U.S. DISTRICT COURT'
TYRONE JULIUS, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No. (j9 ~250
)
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, )
)
Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter comes before the court on plaintiff s application to proceed in forma pauperis

and pro se civil complaint. The court will grant the application, and dismiss the complaint.

Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short

and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court's jurisdiction depends, a short and plain

statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment

for the reliefthe pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum standard of

Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to prepare a

responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the doctrine of res

judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Plaintiffs complaint sets forth no facts at all, and utterly fails to comply with the minimal

requirements of Rule 8(a). Neither the court nor the defendant can discern the nature or basis of

plaintiffs claim, and the basis of the court's jurisdiction is unclear. As drafted, the complaint

fails to comply with Rule 8(a) , and, accordingly, the complaint will be dismissed. An Order

consistent with this Memorandum Opinion will be issued on this same date.

Date: \ \ ItO Id\
rk+~.~
United States District Judge

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2666848. Public record. Not legal advice.