# Long v. Clinton

> District Court, District of Columbia · September 21, 2010

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2665275

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, District of Columbia
- **Decided:** September 21, 2010
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Judge Emmet G. Sullivan
- **Nature of suit:** Civil
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2665275

## Opinion text

, J

FILED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
SEP 2 1 2010
Clerk, U S 01 t 1
Courts f~r the ~j~~~c~ oBfaCnkr,uPtcy
) o umbla
Karen F. Long, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. )
)
Civil Action No.
10 1573
Hillary R. Clinton, )
)
Defendant. )
)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff's pro se complaint and

application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the in forma pauperis

application and dismiss the case because the complaint fails to meet the minimal pleading

requirements of Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch,

656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires

complaints to contain "( 1) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction

[and] (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief."

Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Oralsky v. CIA, 355

F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). The Rule 8 standard ensures that defendants receive fair

notice of the claim being asserted so that they can prepare a responsive answer and an adequate

defense and determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75

F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

/
I~
s , , CUI ';;:6 'ae ( (

Plaintiff, a resident of Ox on Hill, Maryland, sues the Secretary of State. The complaint,

consisting of disjointed phrases, fails to provide any notice of~a_ _ A separate Order of

dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opi

Date: SePtember~ 2010

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2665275. Public record. Not legal advice.