# Long v. Zark

> District Court, District of Columbia · November 3, 2010

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2665060

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, District of Columbia
- **Decided:** November 3, 2010
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Judge Richard J. Leon
- **Nature of suit:** Civil
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2665060

## Opinion text

FILED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NOV - 4 2010
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy
Courts for the District of Columbia
)
Karen F. Long, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. )
)
Civil Action No.
10 1889
Stepen N. Zark, )
)
Defendant. )
)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiffs pro se complaint and

application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the in forma pauperis

application and dismiss the case because the complaint fails to meet the minimal pleading

requirements of Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and is frivolous.

Pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch,

656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires

complaints to contain "( 1) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction

[and] (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief."

Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355

F.3d 661,668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). The Rule 8 standard ensures that defendants receive fair

notice of the claim being asserted so that they can prepare a responsive answer and an adequate

defense and determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75

F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).
Plaintiff, a resident of Oxon Hill, Maryland, purports to sue the President of the American

Bar Association but for what conduct is unknown. I The complaint, consisting of incoherent

scribble, fails to provide any notice of a claim and is simply frivolous. 2 A separate Order of

dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

I The President of the American Bar Association is Stephen N. Zack. See

http://www.abanet.org.

2 This complaint is one of four such submissions received by the Clerk's Office on the
same day. Each complaint names a different defendant. Plaintiff, who just this year has had nine
cases dismissed under similar circumstances, is warned that her persistence in filing frivolous
lawsuits may result in the Court imposing restrictions on her ability to file cases in this Court.

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2665060. Public record. Not legal advice.