# Camarda v. Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards, Inc

> District Court, District of Columbia · January 21, 2014

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2659608

## Case

- **Court:** District Court, District of Columbia
- **Decided:** January 21, 2014
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Judge Richard J. Leon
- **Nature of suit:** Magistrate Case
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2659608

## Opinion text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Raymond P. Moore

Civil Action No. 14-cv-00096-RM-KMT

JEFFREY M. CAMARDA, and
KIMBERLY K. CAMARDA,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER
BOARD OF STANDARDS INC.,

Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER OF TRANSFER
______________________________________________________________________________

THIS MATTER coming before the Court on the Motion to Quash Subpoenas Duces

Tecum filed in this matter by non-parties Lee Mickus, Esq. and John Connell (ECF No. 2) and

the Court being fully advised in the premises, the Court finds and orders as follows:

1. This matter arises out of a civil action pending in the United States District Court,

District of Columbia, captioned Jeffrey M. Camarda, et al v. Certified Financial Planner Board

of Standards, Inc., Civil Action No. 1:2013-cv-00871-RJL.

2. This matter seeks to quash subpoenas for depositions in this district, which

subpoenas were issued by the above-referenced court.

3. This matter is governed by Rule 45(f), Fed.R.Civ.P., which now authorizes the

transfer of a subpoena-related motion by the court where compliance is sought to the issuing
court. Before any such transfer may occur, however, the person subject to the subpoena must

consent to the transfer or this Court must find the existence of exceptional circumstances.

4. In this instance, the parties subject to the subpoenas have expressly consented to

transfer of this matter to the issuing court.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED:

THAT this matter is hereby transferred to the United States District Court for the District

of Columbia in accordance with Rule 45(f), Fed.R.Civ.P.

DATED this 21st day of January, 2014.

BY THE COURT:

____________________________________
RAYMOND P. MOORE
United States District Judge

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2659608. Public record. Not legal advice.