# Jerome Brown v. Hoffman Company, LLC

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · February 20, 2014

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2653887

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** February 20, 2014
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2653887

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2398

JEROME J. BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HOFFMAN COMPANY, LLC; PRESIDENT LAUREN K. DOUGLAS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:13-cv-01364-LMB-TRJ)

Submitted: February 5, 2014 Decided: February 20, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Jerome J. Brown appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil complaint for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See Brown v. Hoffman Co., No. 1:13-cv-

01364-LMB-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 7, 2013; entered Nov. 15,

2013). We grant Brown leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2653887. Public record. Not legal advice.
