# Lana Puckett v. Clarksville Indep School Dist

> Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · January 20, 2014

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2650139

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- **Decided:** January 20, 2014
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2650139

## Opinion text

Case: 13-40397 Document: 00512500997 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/15/2014

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit

No. 13-40397 FILED
January 15, 2014
Lyle W. Cayce
LANA PUCKETT, Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellee
v.

TONYA NELSON,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:11-CV-160

Before JONES, WIENER, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Principal Tonya Nelson appeals the district court’s denial of a motion for
summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity in a case involving
multiple claims related to the molestation of a minor child by a teacher in the
Clarksville Independent School District. Based upon the record and briefs
before us, there clearly exists a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether
there is a causal link between Nelson’s conduct and the constitutional violation
and whether Nelson’s conduct amounted to deliberate indifference. See

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 13-40397 Document: 00512500997 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/15/2014

No. 13-40397
Ontiveros v. City of Rosenberg, Tex., 564 F.3d 379 (5th Cir. 2009); see also Fed.
R. Civ. P. 56(a). Because an appeal of an interlocutory ruling denying qualified
immunity on the existence of factual disputes does not present an exception to
our lack of jurisdiction to hear appeals of interlocutory rulings, we do not have
jurisdiction to hear Nelson’s appeal of the district court’s denial of qualified
immunity at this non-final stage of the proceedings. Therefore, we dismiss the
appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
DISMISSED.

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2650139. Public record. Not legal advice.