# Hollywood Brands v. National Labor Relations Board

> Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · January 29, 1964 · 326 F.2d 400

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/262843

## Case

- **Full name:** HOLLYWOOD BRANDS, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- **Decided:** January 29, 1964
- **Citations:** 326 F.2d 400; 55 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2301; 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6563
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Rives, Cameron, Hunter
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/262843

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
On rehearing petitioner earnestly urges that the questions of (1) whether it refused to bargain in good faith on contract changes proposed by the union, (2) whether it refused to furnish to the union access to'pertinent wage date, and (3) whether its grant of a wage increase without consulting the union amounted to a violation of sections 8(a) (5) and (1) of the Act presented issues of law rather than of fact as held in our per curiam opinion enforcing the order of the Board. 324 F.2d 956 . We disagree. The law concerning all three questions is so well settled as not to justify further discussion. The only debatable question concerns the Board’s factual inferences and findings which, in our opinion, are supported by substantial evidence in the record. The petition for l'ehearing is
Denied,

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/262843. Public record. Not legal advice.