# Marine Forests Society v. California Coastal Commission

> California Supreme Court · April 9, 2003 · 132 Cal. Rptr. 2d 527

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2625908

## Case

- **Court:** California Supreme Court
- **Decided:** April 9, 2003
- **Citations:** 132 Cal. Rptr. 2d 527; 65 P.3d 1285; 2003 Cal. LEXIS 2099
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** George
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2625908

## Opinion text

132 Cal.Rptr.2d 527 (2003)
65 P.3d 1285
MARINE FORESTS SOCIETY et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,
v.
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION et al., Defendants and Appellants.
No. S113466.
Supreme Court of California. En Banc.
April 9, 2003.
Petition for review GRANTED.
Request for judicial notice granted.
In addition to the issue set forth in the petition for review, the parties are requested to brief the following issues:
(1) Assuming the Commission's decision in the present case is constitutionally defective in the manner stated by the Court of Appeal, what is the appropriate remedy available to Marine Forests Society?
(2) What effect would the holding of the Court of Appeal have on past and other currently pending decisions of the California Coastal Commission?
(3) Does the February 20, 2003 amendment to Public Resources Code section 30312 eliminate the separation-of-powers defect found by the Court of Appeal, or is the composition of the Coastal Commission still vulnerable to a separation-of-powers challenge?
GEORGE, C.J, and KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN and MORENO, JJ, concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2625908. Public record. Not legal advice.