# Harold A. Boire, Regional Director, Twelfth Region, National Labor Relations Board v. The Greyhound Corporation

> Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · November 21, 1962 · 309 F.2d 397

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/258581

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- **Decided:** November 21, 1962
- **Citations:** 309 F.2d 397; 51 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2509; 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 3549
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/258581

## Opinion text

309 F.2d 397
Harold A. BOIRE, Regional Director, Twelfth Region, National
Labor Relations Board, Appellant,
v.
The GREYHOUND CORPORATION, Appellee.
No. 19755.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Nov. 21, 1962.
Marcel Mallet-Prevost, James C. Paras, Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Herman M. Levy, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, for appellant.
Warren E. Hall, Jr., Chesterfield H. Smith, Wofford H. Stidham, Bartow, Fla., for appellee.
Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., Alexander E. Wilson, III, Atlanta, Ga. (Wilson, Branch & Barwick, Atlanta, Ga., of counsel) as amicus curiae and on behalf of Floors, Inc.
I. J. Gromfine, Washington, D.C. (Zimrign, Gromfine & Sternstein, Washington, D.C., of counsel) as amicus curiae, and on behalf of Amalgamated Association of Street, Electric Railway and Motor Coach Employees of America, AFL-CIO.
Before JONES and BELL, Circuit Judges, and CARSWELL, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
1
The questions in this important case were carefully considered by the district court and discussed by the judge to whom the case was assigned. Greyhound Corporation v. Boire, D.C., 205 F.Supp. 686 . We find ourselves in agreement with the principles there stated and the decision there reached. The judgment of the district court is
2
Affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/258581. Public record. Not legal advice.