# MATTER OF NEW YORK CITY HOUS. & REDEVELOPMENT BD. v. Foley

> New York Court of Appeals · December 1, 1965 · 16 N.Y.2d 1071

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2584442

## Case

- **Court:** New York Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** December 1, 1965
- **Citations:** 16 N.Y.2d 1071; 213 N.E.2d 686
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2584442

## Opinion text

16 N.Y.2d 1071 (1965)
In the Matter of the New York City Housing and Redevelopment Board, Appellant,
v.
Max H. Foley et al., Constituting the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.
In the Matter of Amalia V. Betanzos et al., Appellants,
v.
Max H. Foley et al., Constituting the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Argued October 25, 1965.
Decided December 1, 1965.
Sol A. Liebman for New York City Housing and Redevelopment Board, appellant.
Edward Robin for Amalia V. Betanzos and others, appellants.
Charles F. Preusse , William T. Farley and Ansley Kime for Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Incorporated, respondent.
Leo A. Larkin , Corporation Counsel ( Rose Schneph of counsel), for Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, respondent.
Norman Marcus for New York City Planning Commission, amicus curiๆ.
Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2584442. Public record. Not legal advice.