# Greystone Mgmt. Corp. v. Conciliation & Appeals Bd. of the City of New York

> New York Court of Appeals · May 1, 1984 · 62 N.Y.2d 763

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2583311

## Case

- **Full name:** Greystone Management Corp. Et Al., Appellants, v. Conciliation and Appeals Board of the City of New York, Respondent
- **Court:** New York Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** May 1, 1984
- **Citations:** 62 N.Y.2d 763; 477 N.Y.S.2d 315; 465 N.E.2d 1251; 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 9011
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye Concur
- **Cited by:** 46 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2583311

## Opinion text

OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in refusing to grant declaratory relief in this case
(Bower & Gardner v Evans,
60 NY2d 781 ). Generally, a declaratory judgment action is not the proper vehicle to challenge an administrative procedure, where judicial review by way of article 78 proceeding is available.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wacht-ler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/2583311. Public record. Not legal advice.